Graham Syfert, Jacksonville Defense Attorney

Jacksonville Foreclosure Defense
Jacksonville Criminal Lawyer
Syfert.com - Home of Graham W. Syfert, Esq., P.A.

"I write every one of my websites in notepad, and this one, I guess, is proof."

*
This is the homepage of Graham W. Syfert, a Jacksonville attorney practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense and Foreclosure Defense. This is a personal webpage and will contain examples of the cases and issues which have shaped me, and the stories that surround them. It sounds boring, but I might have a sense of humor in one of these stories.

The latest news:

Sunday, August, 14th, 2011

As some of you may have read, or heard, I gained some notoriety for my sale of Self-Help defense forms which I previously offered. I believe the good use of putting the forms up for sale has run its course, and I am now urging everyone to download these forms and take them to a local attorney. I have offered the forms for free at http://www.syfert.com/ Click on the Download for free link, and when you close Payloadz, you will find yourself at a directory listing which contains Form v1.2 and Comments to Form 1.2. Payloadz is only now for those who wish to donate .99 cents or $19.95. The comments and the forms are now free to the general public.

I have released these forms for free due to the actions of the Plaintiff's attorney's, the so called "Copyright Trolls", which now are representing the shameless industry of pornography, in an effort to coerce innocent people to pay settlements.

They use coercion and extortion, threatening to out homosexuals, to ruin marriages, and the weirder the pornography, the better for their purposes.

Those who believe in the free flow of information guaranteed by the first amendment, made available by the use of the internet understand that anonymity in freedom of speech is as important as the Bill of Rights.

These methods of coercion, threatening to out homosexuals, threatening families, and putting people in a position to not want to help through the free flow of information and the uninhibited flow of packets. These actions have harmed our telecommunication industry by causing unnecessary and untold costs associated with the diligent research of each IP address requested by a Plaintiffs attorney. These actions have harmed too many innocent citizens, and are making a mockery of the rules regarding Fundamental Fairness and Jurisdiction. These actions have harmed small businesses by causing them to incur fees and costs associated with defending these actions. Providers of free wifi find themselves subject to a subpoena and a demand letter, coercing settlement.

In a perfect world, everyone would have open and publically available WiFi hotspots and these would be encouraged. Everyone would distribute files through Tor. This model of open communication, which has been greatly protected by organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation is fundamental to America.

Also fundamental, is the right to be proven innocent in court, and to not be held accountable for things that were not your responsibility. If someone else committed the infringement, you need to contact an attorney. No attorney should honestly believe, and no judge should find that creating access to one's own chattel property, and onto the internet, is an act of negligence. It should be solely governed by the contract between the consumer and the internet service provider, and even then, restrictions on access should be severely limited so as not to disrupt the normal flow of information from all computers, to all computers. It is the right of the consumer, when not limited by these contracts, to share access how the consumer sees fit. Providers of true internet access, be they public, or private entities, should be allowed to grant access how they see fit.

I would like thank all of the Federal judges who ruled favorably against these massacre lawsuits, and now, too many people are simply sending letters in their defense. Everyone contemplating sending a letter to the court, contact an attorney in your state.



Lightspeed Media Corp. v. John Does 1-160, State Case No. 2011-034345-0000-01 / Local Case No. 2011-34345-CA-01
Pink Lotus Entertainment, LLC., Boy Racer, Inc., AF Holdings, LLC, Axel Braun Productions, Baseprotect UG, Ltd., CP Productions, Inc., Camelot Distribution Group, Inc., Digital Sin, Inc., Discount Video Center, Inc.,

Evasive Angles Entertainment, Inc., Evasive Angles, Inc., First Time Videos, LLC, Future Blue Inc., Hard Drive Productions, Inc., IO Group, Inc., Imperial Enterprises, Inc., K-Beech, Inc., MCGIP LLC, Maverick Entertainment Group Inc, Media Products, Inc., Millenium TGA, Inc., New Sensations, Inc., Nu Image, Inc., Pacific Century International Limited, Patrick Collins, Inc., Raw Films, Inc., SBO Pictures, Inc., Third Degree Films, Inc., Third World Media, LLC, Voltage Pictures, LLC, West Coast Productions Inc.,

Steele Hansmeier, Prenda Law, Terik Hashmi, Paul Duffy, Paul A. Duffy, John Steele, Brett Gibbs, Brett L. Gibbs, Alexander Lian, Alexander O. Lian, Joseph Perea, Mark Lutz, Joanne Diez, Wayne O'Bryan, Timothy V. Anderson, Timothy Anderson, Neil Rubin, Neil H. Rubin, Michael O'Malley, Transnational Law Group.